Pressure-Test Intake
Some requests are ready to become a task. Others are more like a foggy field with a useful building somewhere inside it.
Pressure-Test Intake is the path for the second kind. It is how Guildhall takes a broad feature, release, or product request and turns it into something a worker can actually build without making up the important parts.
What New Request does first
When you add a New Request, Guildhall routes it before it creates work. A small bug fix can become a task brief. A question can stay a question. A settings change can go to Settings. A repair ask can become triage.
Broad release and feature requests take the Pressure-Test path. So do requests that sound like "pressure test this," "ask me everything," or "turn this into a product spec." Multi-part requests are split into reviewable actions instead of being mashed into one grand mystery sandwich.
Guildhall also watches for a quieter kind of ambiguity: requests that sound like policy, planning, or spec work but could also mean "go implement this now." For example, "set the overhead fee policy" might mean:
- decide the business rule;
- write the policy/spec;
- apply it in the product;
- verify calculations, copy, docs, and rollout.
Those pieces belong together, but they are not all the same task. Guildhall can record that component stack and ask whether you want a spec first, a parent feature with linked child tasks, or direct implementation.
The first visible card is simple: New request, the original ask, and the routing summary. If Guildhall finds a similar live card, it reuses that card instead of starting a duplicate trail.
The aim is to remove overhead, not judgment. Guildhall inspects project evidence, narrows the uncertainty, and asks the smallest useful question it can. Product taste, risk tolerance, release judgment, and the calls that actually need your hand stay visible instead of being quietly decided for you.
The intake rhythm
Pressure-Test Intake asks one question at a time in Thread. Each question has:
- the target it is pressure-testing;
- the domain it belongs to, such as product goals, workflows, or risks and non-goals;
- why this question matters;
- any evidence Guildhall already found in project notes or docs.
After you answer, Guildhall saves the answer and decides the next useful move. If the answer is still too soft for a worker, it asks for one concrete example or threshold. If the domain looks covered, it asks a closeout question before moving on.
This is intentionally slower than "sure, I'll build it." It is also where a lot of future pain gets politely mugged before it reaches your codebase.
What gets persisted
Pressure-Test Intake is not a chat memory trick. Guildhall writes down the useful parts so you can pause, come back, and continue without asking everyone to remember the last conversation. It keeps:
- known facts and where they came from;
- open unknowns;
- questions already asked and answered;
- follow-up candidates;
- assumptions, decisions, and deferrals;
- language-map candidates that may become project vocabulary later.
That matters because a release plan is rarely decided in one sitting. You can answer a question, stop, come back, and still see what Guildhall believes it knows.
The output
When the intake closes, Guildhall can render a buildable spec or release plan. The useful part is not the formatting. The useful part is that the spec tells the truth:
- what domains were covered;
- what Guildhall is assuming;
- what was explicitly deferred;
- what a worker and reviewer need to verify.
A completed intake makes the next task smaller, not just prettier. If a domain is unknown, it stays visible as an assumption or deferral instead of quietly turning into a surprise halfway through implementation.
For ambiguous policy/spec requests, the output may be a parent feature rather than one runnable task. That parent can hold the decision and spec while linked child tasks handle UI, API, data, docs, release, and verification work in smaller pieces.
When not to use it
Pressure-Test Intake is for broad, risky, or under-shaped work. A tiny docs copy edit, a known failing test, or a one-file repair can take the shorter task path. Guildhall can still ask a clarification question when needed, but it does not need to stage a whole town meeting for a missing comma.